![]() |
1
iorilu 3 天前
一直没太确认, 什么算一次, 一次问话就是一次吗
|
![]() |
2
lqw3030 3 天前
摘要:向 [email protected] 地址发送回退邮件申请,提供账户邮箱
|
3
NNNNzs 3 天前
按月付费的用户,新的计费周期岂不是只能用新的计费方式,不能回退了
|
4
kreviazukzhou 3 天前
The opt-out option is not available for student plan users. Since the student plan is provided at no cost, we're unable to offer the previous usage model for this plan tier 。我也发了,给我回这个,因为我是用学生认证获取的会员,哈哈
|
5
Ayanokouji OP @NNNNzs 应该是的,我的回退生效时间,也是到下次付费前。
|
6
yigehaozi1 3 天前
他这是啥论坛程序
|
![]() |
7
HFX3389 3 天前
@yigehaozi1 #6 discourse
|
![]() |
9
xubingok 3 天前
还用发邮件?
我当时是设置里面直接切换退回的啊. 现在都还有使用新计划按钮. |
![]() |
10
dfkjgklfdjg 3 天前
@iorilu #1 ,一次交互,也就是一次 “问&答” 算一次请求,然后乘上倍率。
倍率就是按照模型来区分,我看现在倍率只有 Cluad 4 是 2 倍请求。 这些在 docs 里面都有具体说明的,但是现在 cursor 一直在改规则,非常不好找这些定义了。 不过可以借鉴 copilot 上面的文档 https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/copilot-billing/understanding-and-managing-requests-in-copilot |
11
Ayanokouji OP @xubingok 有错过的,比如我,现在页面上已经没有回退按钮了。
|
![]() |
12
iorilu 3 天前
@dfkjgklfdjg 好的
不过先择也理解为啥 cursor 不愿按次数算了, 因为一次使用 token 范围太广了 如果问得好可能一次就改上千行代码, 肯定消耗 token 也是巨大的 用户用的越熟练, 一次消耗 token 就越多, 所以先择都不想按次数算了 |
![]() |
13
dfkjgklfdjg 3 天前
@Ayanokouji #5 ,周一刚刚续费完,还是按次计费的旧模式,没有变更到新模式。
设置里面也一直都有 `Opt In to New Pricing` 这个按钮。 |
![]() |
14
twofox 3 天前
我也还是 500 次的请求收费策略。但是好像没有什么用。
因为用量那里已经不显示消耗的次数了,也不现实 token 。我也不知道这个 500 跟以前的 500 是否一致 |
![]() |
16
logyxiao 3 天前
谢谢提示, 我也错过了. 这就发个邮件试试
|
![]() |
17
sillydaddy 3 天前
我也切回去了。
前几天我也发了邮件,发完就后悔了:这不是耍猴吗?!网站上加一个按钮的事,为什么要让人发邮件。结果今天一看还真切回了 500 次,而且是从切回来之后开始计算次数。之前的都不计算在内。 Cursor 团队的脑回路真是理解不了。难道是使用 AI 处理的邮件?非常有可能,不然怎么人工处理啊。 |
![]() |
18
jiang24gdufs 3 天前
感谢提醒😀
|
![]() |
19
dfkjgklfdjg 3 天前
@iorilu #12 ,默认是有 token 上限的,默认是 128k 。开启 Max 模式之后上下文会更大,但是消耗量也会变大(直接按照 token 折算成 request ,并且开启按量计费),500 次很快就会用完,之后就开始进入用量计费了。
但大部分情况下其实用不完 128k 的上下文,月费上限是很简单能够计算出来的。Cursor 也有针对引用的上下文有所优化(所以都在使用 Claude 模型的时,会比直接用 Claude Code 效果要差),理论上消耗的 token 会更少。 |
![]() |
20
psilo 3 天前
感谢,已发邮件,等待反馈
|
![]() |
21
iblessyou 3 天前
问下 cursor 刚出时,我试用过一段时间,好像是有免费的用来着。好像没用,现在还是么。
|
![]() |
22
1016 3 天前
有模板吗?
如何告诉他要他帮忙切回 500 次的请求收费策略啊? |
23
Ayanokouji OP ![]() @1016 元宝帮我写的邮件,你自己改下。
Subject: Request to Revert to Old Pricing – Annual Subscription Holder Dear Cursor Team, I am writing as an annual subscriber under my previous pricing plan. As confirmed in your recent communications: "The pricing you purchased will continue to be reflected for the duration of your billing period." However, I was unable to opt out of recent changes and wish to revert to the request-based pricing model until its sunset, as indicated in your policy: "Existing users wanting to use request-based pricing [...] can reach out to our team ([email protected])." Please assist me in transitioning back to this legacy plan for the remainder of my annual billing cycle ([End Date, if known]). I appreciate your support in honoring this option for existing users. To simplify your process: 🔹 Account Email: [Your Account Email] 🔹 Subscription Tier: [Pro/Basic, if applicable] Thank you for your prompt attention to this request. Best regards, [Your Full Name] [Contact Information, if needed] |
![]() |
24
Pters 3 天前
Subject: Request to Restore Original Subscription Terms (500 Requests/Month)
Dear Cursor Support Team, I am writing to formally raise a concern regarding the recent change in your pricing and usage policy. When I initially subscribed to the yearly plan, the agreement clearly stated a limit of 500 requests per month. However, it appears that this policy has been unilaterally changed to an “unlimited” model with hidden caps, which effectively locks me out of usage well before the end of the month — in my case, before the 10th. This change is highly disruptive and, more importantly, constitutes a breach of the original terms under which I subscribed. While I understand and respect your right to adjust pricing models for new customers, it is both unfair and potentially unlawful to alter the terms of an ongoing annual subscription without explicit consent. I am willing to accept a price increase under transparent and mutually agreed terms, but I cannot accept arbitrary changes that materially impact the usability of the product I have paid for. I therefore request that my subscription be returned to the original model — 500 requests per month — until the end of my current contract period. If this issue cannot be resolved amicably, I may be forced to pursue further action, as this situation raises serious concerns about consumer protection and the enforcement of contractual obligations. I hope to hear from you soon with a resolution. Sincerely, [Your Full Name] [Your Email Address or Account ID] [Date] |
![]() |
25
Chatterleys 3 天前
|
26
Ayanokouji OP @Chatterleys 四楼回答了
|
27
jetttt 3 天前
话说切换回旧的计费方式,超出 500 次的还能用慢速请求吗
|
![]() |
28
thfurior 3 天前
感谢提醒,已切回
|
29
Yancc 3 天前
感谢提醒,已发邮件
|
![]() |
30
catfly 2 天前
claude 模型一次算 2 次。也就 250 次。
|
31
Ayanokouji OP @catfly 次数差不多,但是新收费策略,经常给限速,用的不爽。
Pro: ~225 Sonnet 4 requests, ~550 Gemini requests, or ~650 GPT 4.1 requests Pro+: ~675 Sonnet 4 requests, ~1,650 Gemini requests, or ~1,950 GPT 4.1 requests Ultra: ~4,500 Sonnet 4 requests, ~11,000 Gemini requests, or ~13,000 GPT 4.1 requests |
![]() |
32
catfly 2 天前
@Ayanokouji #31 嗯嗯。理论上我只用 claude 。。其他模型还真不行。
|